<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>supercycle on Transportational.com</title>
    <link>https://transportational.com/tags/supercycle/</link>
    <description>Recent content in supercycle on Transportational.com</description>
    <generator>Hugo -- gohugo.io</generator>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 Feb 2026 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://transportational.com/tags/supercycle/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>After the Hangover: Container Shipping Learns to Live Without the Supercycle</title>
      <link>https://transportational.com/2026/02/10/container-shipping-after-supercycle/</link>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 Feb 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      
      <guid>https://transportational.com/2026/02/10/container-shipping-after-supercycle/</guid>
      <description>For a while, container shipping forgot what normal felt like. Extraordinary profits blurred into strategy, and what began as an emergency response to pandemic chaos slowly hardened into a belief that the industry had been permanently re-rated. Now the correction is arriving, not with a crash but with a long, grinding realization that the rules never actually changed. The “structural reset” language coming out of industry circles is less a forecast than an admission: the supercycle is done, and carriers are being dragged back into a business model they briefly escaped.</description>
    </item>
    
  </channel>
</rss>
